netdev - Re: [PATCH net 4/4] tcp: various missing rcu_read_lock around __sk_dst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1459474646.3751154.565322314.303C5B08@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date:	Fri, 01 Apr 2016 03:37:26 +0200
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	sasha.levin@...cle.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
	alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, mkubecek@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/4] tcp: various missing rcu_read_lock around
 __sk_dst_get



On Fri, Apr 1, 2016, at 03:23, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 02:30 +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> 
> > I fixed this one, I wait with review a bit and collapse some of the 
> > newer fixes into one and check and repost again tomorrow.
> 
> No change should be needed in TCP, once net/core/sock.c is fixed.
> 
> When someone fixes a lockdep issue, it should be mandatory to include in
> the changelog the lockdep splat, so that we can double check.

Yup, will do that. Every change will be a single patch with lockdep
report.

Thank you,
Hannes