netdev - Re: [PATCH V2 00/22] net-next: mediatek: various fixes and IRQ grouping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160509.120227.2024353376219563839.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 09 May 2016 12:02:27 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	john@...ozen.org
Cc:	nbd@....name, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/22] net-next: mediatek: various fixes and IRQ
 grouping

From: John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
Date: Mon,  9 May 2016 12:03:52 +0200

> This series introduces a number of fixes that we stumbled across while
> doing more performance testing and code level reviewing. Additionally
> it improves the PHY setup code adding support for fixed phys, asymmetric
> flow control and gigabit feature advertisement. Next the series adds a
> support for IRQ grouping, allowing use to separate the IRQs onto more than
> one core using irq affinity. The last two patches wrap up the series by
> updating my email address.

This is too many patches to submit as a unit at one time.  Plus
this patch series contains lots of unrelated changes.

Split this up into logical units of related changes, and then submit
each smaller series one at a time, waiting each time for the current
series to be accepted before submitting the next one.

This is what I was trying to encourage you to do last time, I
hope what we expect is cleaerer now.

Thank you.