netdev - Re: [PATCH net V2] net/mlx5e: Fix del vxlan port command buffer memset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALzJLG9a7L+_CYdweAu=z6uA91HHswTCjHBdB81PppKSYD-WcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:08:06 +0300
From:	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
To:	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Matthew Finlay <matt@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V2] net/mlx5e: Fix del vxlan port command buffer memset

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:39:53AM +0300, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> memset the command buffers rather than the pointers to them.
>
> that is still wrong commit log.
> This patch makes zero difference to generated code.
> '&in' is the same as 'in'
>

Who said they are not ? There was a mistake in the original log
message and it was fixed here.
The patch was made to make the code consistent with other places in
the code, and i don't see anything wrong with the log message.