[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <105bbdcd07774b849f1636904db3e8f6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:33:19 +0530
From: Sathya Perla <sathya.perla@...adcom.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [net-next PATCH 4/4] be2net: replace polling with sleeping in the
FW completion path
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sathya Perla [mailto:sathya.perla@...adcom.com]
> > >
> > > > @@ -4477,6 +4551,22 @@ static int be_if_create(struct be_adapter
> > *adapter)
> > > > u32 cap_flags = be_if_cap_flags(adapter);
> > > > int status;
> > > >
> > > > + /* alloc required memory for other filtering fields */
> > > > + adapter->pmac_id = kcalloc(be_max_uc(adapter),
> > > > + sizeof(*adapter->pmac_id), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!adapter->pmac_id)
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +
> > > > + adapter->mc_list = kcalloc(be_max_mc(adapter),
> > > > + sizeof(*adapter->mc_list), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!adapter->mc_list)
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +
> > > > + adapter->uc_list = kcalloc(be_max_uc(adapter),
> > > > + sizeof(*adapter->uc_list), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!adapter->uc_list)
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > These error paths are leaking memory, please audit this in the rest
> > > of
> > your change as well.
> >
> > David, thanks for catching this; will fix this (and others if any) and
> > send out a v2.
>
> David, actually, when be_if_create() returns an error, it falls back into
> the error path of
> be_setup() (the caller) and be_clear() is called. be_clear() calls
> be_if_destroy() which frees the allocated memory.
> So, this code will not leak memory in the error path.
David, can you accept the v1 patch set as-is, as it doesn't have the memory
leaks that you suspected initially?
thanks,
-Sathya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists