netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] iproute2: build nsid-name cache only for commands that need it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:25:40 +0300
From:   Vadim Kochan <vadim4j@...il.com>
To:     Anton Aksola <aakso@....fi>
Cc:     Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iproute2: build nsid-name cache only for commands that
 need it

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Anton Aksola <aakso@....fi> wrote:
> Ok, I will post a new patch version. Should tests be posted in a separate
> patch?
>
> 2016-09-16 12:44 GMT+03:00 Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>:
>>
>> Le 16/09/2016 à 11:23, Vadim Kochan a écrit :
>> [snip]
>> > Would it be useful to add test for this case into testsuite/ ?
>> Yes, it's a good idea.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nicolas
>
>

Anton, I just looked into tests after when I did post here. I am not
sure it will be trivial,
currently tests are running within separated network namespace by
default (which I did) via
'unshare' tool, and now I see that it is better to call it explicitly
from the each test case. So
I am not sure netns related  tests might be valid if they will be ran
after 'unshare -n', if yes - then there is no problem, otherwise
it needs to be fixed somehow - I will try to do this.

Regards,
Vadim Kochan