netdev - Re: [patch net-next 00/15] net: sched: summer cleanup part 2, ndo_setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d213c57b-76e3-0132-5ca9-7237c6e40280@mojatatu.com>
Date:   Sun, 6 Aug 2017 08:28:06 -0400
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        daniel@...earbox.net, mlxsw@...lanox.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        simon.horman@...ronome.com, pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com,
        dirk.vandermerwe@...ronome.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
        amritha.nambiar@...el.com, oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 00/15] net: sched: summer cleanup part 2,
 ndo_setup_tc

On 17-08-05 10:53 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
> 
> This patchset focuses on ndo_setup_tc and its args.
> Currently there are couple of things that do not make much sense.
> The type is passed in struct tc_to_netdev, but as it is always
> required, should be arg of the ndo. Other things are passed as args
> but they are only relevant for cls offloads and not mqprio. Therefore,
> they should be pushed to struct. As the tc_to_netdev struct in the end
> is just a container of single pointer, we get rid of it and pass the
> struct according to type. So in the end, we have:
> ndo_setup_tc(dev, type, type_data_struct)
> 
> There are couple of cosmetics done on the way to make things smooth.
> Also, reported error is consolidated to eopnotsupp in case the
> asked offload is not supported.
> 

I did a quick review of all the patches and they are simple, nice
cleanups. Instead of acking each one individually, i am just acking
this one.

Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>

cheers,
jamal