[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALzJLG9GOgzOOOM+shw4ECxp6XcteePyBmo6V47_sF=YDYEidA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 15:58:57 +0300
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 10/15] net/mlx5: Add a blank line after declarations
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 16:29 +0300, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
> []
>> @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ static enum mlx5_dev_event port_subtype_event(u8 subtype)
>> static void eq_update_ci(struct mlx5_eq *eq, int arm)
>> {
>> __be32 __iomem *addr = eq->doorbell + (arm ? 0 : 2);
>> +
>> u32 val = (eq->cons_index & 0xffffff) | (eq->eqn << 24);
>> __raw_writel((__force u32)cpu_to_be32(val), addr);
>> /* We still want ordering, just not swabbing, so add a barrier */
>
> checkpatch is stupid.
>
> The blank line should be after u32 val = ...
> and not after __be32 __iomem *addr = ...
>
>
You are completely right ! will fix this, Thanks !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists