[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171028072031.GC1980@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 09:20:31 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Cc: "Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@...lsio.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>, idosch@...lanox.com,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com, john.hurley@...ronome.com,
"Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 00/20] net: sched: convert cls ndo_setup_tc
offload calls to per-block callbacks
Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 02:52:00AM CEST, kubakici@...pl wrote:
>On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:27:30 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >>> 2. Deleting the ingress qdisc fails to remove filters added in
>> >>> HW. Filters in SW gets deleted.
>> >>>
>> >>> We haven’t exactly root-caused this, the changes being extensive, but
>> >>> our guess is again something wrong with the offload check or similar
>> >>> while unregistering the block callback (tcf_block_cb_unregister) and
>> >>> further to the classifier (CLS_U32/CLS_FLOWER etc.) with the
>> >>> DESTROY/REMOVE command.
>> >>
>> >> Hmm. How does this worked previously. I mean, do you see change of
>> >> behaviour? I'm asking because I don't see how rules added only to HW
>> >> could be removed, driver should care of it. Or are you talking about
>> >> rules added to both SW and HW?
>> >
>> >These are rules added to both SW and HW. Previously all cls_* had
>> >ndo_setup_tc calls based on the offload capability.
>> >
>> >commit 8d26d5636d "net: sched: avoid ndo_setup_tc calls for
>> >TC_SETUP_CLS*" removed this bit to work with the new block callback. Is
>> >there something similar in the block callback flow while acting on the
>> >tcf_proto destroy call initiated when the qdisc is cleared?
>>
>> Yes, it is the same.
>
>FWIW I also see what Amritha and Alex are describing here, for cls_bpf
>there are no DESTROYs coming on rmmod or qdisc del. There is a DESTROY
>if I manually remove the filter (or if an ADD with skip_sw fails).
Is this different to the original behaviour? Just for cls_bpf?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists