netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2 3/7] iplink: Use "dev" and "name" parameters interchangeable when possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:35:15 +0200
From:   Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2 3/7] iplink: Use "dev" and "name"
 parameters interchangeable when possible

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:37:25 +0200
> Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> Both of them accept network device name as argument, but have different
>> meaning:
>>
>>   dev  - is a device by it's name,
>>   name - name for specific device device.
>>
>> The only case where they treated separately is network device rename
>> case where need to specify both ifindex and new name. In rest of the
>> cases we can assume that dev == name.
> 
> I would rather keep name as only being a valid argument for set command.
> And reject use of:
> 
>    ip li show name eth0
> 

But ip-link(8) man page is full of examples where "name" is used instead
of "dev". I suppose there are lot of configuration we can broke when
explicitly disabling "name" as an alternative to "dev".

Especially on the first lines in man page we have:

ip link add [ link DEVICE ] [ name ] NAME
...

and there is no reference to "dev".

What do you think?



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)