netdev - Re: interdependencies with cxgb4 and iw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Mar 2018 11:18:24 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     swise@...ngridcomputing.com
Cc:     rajur@...lsio.com, dledford@...hat.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        jgg@...pe.ca, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bharat@...lsio.com,
        ganeshgr@...lsio.com, rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: interdependencies with cxgb4 and iw_cxgb4

From: "Steve Wise" <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:08:44 -0500

> For the maintainers, yes.  But it avoids setting up k.o accounts and
> git repos for each device driver maintainer that has this issue.

I think this is quite a reasonable requirement for submitters wishing
to make significant changes across two subsystems with complex
interdependencies.

It is critical to get the changes tested in both the RDMA and net-next
tree contexts as early as possible, and to shake out any intergration
issues (which happens transparently via linux-next).

I know it's easy to see the personal "burdon" it causes you as an
individual developer, but you really have to consider how much is
in-flight and being dealt with by maintainers of very active
subsystems like the networking.

Thank you.