[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d8001d3c05e$f63bf660$e2b3e320$@opengridcomputing.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:20:21 -0500
From: "Steve Wise" <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
To: "'David Miller'" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: <rajur@...lsio.com>, <dledford@...hat.com>,
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <jgg@...pe.ca>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bharat@...lsio.com>,
<ganeshgr@...lsio.com>, <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com>
Subject: RE: interdependencies with cxgb4 and iw_cxgb4
>
> From: "Steve Wise" <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:08:44 -0500
>
> > For the maintainers, yes. But it avoids setting up k.o accounts and
> > git repos for each device driver maintainer that has this issue.
>
> I think this is quite a reasonable requirement for submitters wishing
> to make significant changes across two subsystems with complex
> interdependencies.
>
> It is critical to get the changes tested in both the RDMA and net-next
> tree contexts as early as possible, and to shake out any intergration
> issues (which happens transparently via linux-next).
>
> I know it's easy to see the personal "burdon" it causes you as an
> individual developer, but you really have to consider how much is
> in-flight and being dealt with by maintainers of very active
> subsystems like the networking.
>
> Thank you.
Fair enough. Thanks Dave.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists