[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx-V8L602X-EHgrJPNA49v_ZiBZW=+v=tcSQK5QZOXYJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 13:04:23 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: Boot failures with net-next after rebase to v4.17.0-rc1
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm experiencing boot failures with net-next git-tree after it got
> rebased/merged with Linus'es tree at v4.17.0-rc1.
I suspect it's the global bit stuff that came in very late in the
merge window, and had been developed and tested for a while before,
but showed some problems under some configs.
The fix is currently in the x86/pti tree in -tip, see:
x86/pti: Fix boot problems from Global-bit setting
and I expect it will percolate upstream soon.
In the meantime, it would be good to verify that merging that x86/pti
branch fixes it for you?
There is another candidate for boot problems - do you happen to have
CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT enabled? That can under certain
circumstances get a percpu setup page fault because memory hadn't been
initialized sufficiently.
The fix there is to move the mm_init() call one step earlier in
init_main(): start_kernel() (to before trap_init()).
And if it's neither of the above, I think you'll need to help bisect it.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists