lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1531936206-3118-1-git-send-email-jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:50:06 +0200
From:   Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <gordan.mihaljevic@...tech.com.au>, <tung.q.nguyen@...tech.com.au>,
        <hoang.h.le@...tech.com.au>, <jon.maloy@...csson.com>,
        <canh.d.luu@...tech.com.au>, <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
        <tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [net-next  1/1] tipc: make link capability update thread safe

The commit referred to below introduced an update of the link
capabilities field that is not safe. Given the recently added
feature to remove idle node and link items after 5 minutes, there
is a small risk that the update will happen at the very moment the
targeted link is being removed. To avoid this we have to perform
the update inside the node item's write lock protection.

Fixes: 9012de508956 ("tipc: add sequence number check for link STATE messages")
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
---
 net/tipc/node.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/tipc/node.c b/net/tipc/node.c
index 52fd80b..3819ab1 100644
--- a/net/tipc/node.c
+++ b/net/tipc/node.c
@@ -370,13 +370,17 @@ static struct tipc_node *tipc_node_create(struct net *net, u32 addr,
 	spin_lock_bh(&tn->node_list_lock);
 	n = tipc_node_find(net, addr);
 	if (n) {
+		if (n->capabilities == capabilities)
+			goto exit;
 		/* Same node may come back with new capabilities */
+		write_lock_bh(&n->lock);
 		n->capabilities = capabilities;
 		for (bearer_id = 0; bearer_id < MAX_BEARERS; bearer_id++) {
 			l = n->links[bearer_id].link;
 			if (l)
 				tipc_link_update_caps(l, capabilities);
 		}
+		write_unlock_bh(&n->lock);
 		goto exit;
 	}
 	n = kzalloc(sizeof(*n), GFP_ATOMIC);
-- 
2.1.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ