netdev - Re: [iproute PATCH] ip-address: Fix filtering by negated address flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:52:51 +0100
From:   Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iproute PATCH] ip-address: Fix filtering by negated address
 flags

Hi Stephen,

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 02:47:59PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:12:01 +0100
> Phil Sutter <phil@....cc> wrote:
> 
> > +	if (arg[0] == '-') {
> > +		inv = true;
> > +		arg++;
> > +	}
> The inverse logic needs to be moved into the loop handling filter names.
> 
> Otherwise, you get weirdness like "-dynamic" being accepted and not
> doing what was expected.

I intentionally moved it there to allow for '-dynamic' and '-primary'
as well. IMO this is consistent: 'dynamic' is the inverse of 'permanent'
and 'primary' the inverse of 'secondary' but currently only '-permanent'
and '-secondary' are allowed. With my patch applied, one may specify not
only '-permanent' to get the same effect as 'dynamic' but also
'-dynamic' to get the same effect as 'permanent'. Likewise for the other
two. Did I miss something?

> Also, please make sure the man page matches the code.

Oh, right. Given the above is fine with you, I will add the man page
change in v2.

Thanks, Phil