lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0402MB3600F31F8665EB1BDAFBAE36FFC30@VI1PR0402MB3600.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:54:48 +0000
From:   Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>
To:     Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] brcmfmac: Use standard SKB list accessors in
 brcmf_sdiod_sglist_rw.

From: Arend van Spriel [mailto:arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com] Sent: 2018年11月14日 16:40
> To: Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>; David Miller
> <davem@...emloft.net>; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: Use standard SKB list accessors in
> brcmf_sdiod_sglist_rw.
> 
> On 11/14/2018 4:28 AM, Andy Duan wrote:
> > From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Sent: 2018年11月11日 8:34
> >> [ As I am trying to remove direct SKB list pointer accesses I am
> >>   committing this to net-next.  If this causes a lot of grief I
> >>   can and will revert, just let me know. ]
> 
> [...]
> 
> >
> > I just have bcm4339 in hands, test the patch on i.MX7D sdb board with
> bcm4339, it works fine with iperf testing.
> >
> > Tested-by: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@....com>
> 
> Thanks, Andy
> 
> Can you do one more check? Please insert brcmfmac with module parameter
> debug=2 and let me know if the following log message is seen:
> 
> brcmfmac: brcmf_sdiod_sgtable_alloc: nents=X
> 
> If not seen, the driver does not go through the patched code.
My kernel don't enable debug and DEBUG and CONFIG_BRCM_TRACING, I add the debug info in the brcmf_sdiod_sgtable_alloc(), and the log show the driver go through the sg path:
Log: brcmf_sdiod_sgtable_alloc: max_segs:128, sg_support:1, nents=35

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ