[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181207.231514.1338299086653086987.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 23:15:14 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: brouer@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, toke@...e.dk, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
jasowang@...hat.com, ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org,
bjorn.topel@...el.com, w@....eu, saeedm@...lanox.com,
mykyta.iziumtsev@...il.com, borkmann@...earbox.net,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, tariqt@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH RFC 4/8] net: core: add recycle capabilities
on skbs via page_pool API
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:25:47 +0100
> @@ -744,6 +745,10 @@ struct sk_buff {
> head_frag:1,
> xmit_more:1,
> pfmemalloc:1;
> + /* TODO: Future idea, extend mem_info with __u8 flags, and
> + * move bits head_frag and pfmemalloc there.
> + */
> + struct xdp_mem_info mem_info;
This is 4 bytes right?
I guess I can live with this.
Please do some microbenchmarks to make sure this doesn't show any
obvious regressions.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists