netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] selftests: bpf: add trivial JSET test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181213105220.48fcdc08@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 10:52:20 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] selftests: bpf: add trivial JSET test

On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:17:37 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Could we rather extend the test_verifier infrastructure in order to
> be able to define data input for bpf_prog_test_run()? I think this
> would be very useful for future tests there as well and avoid having
> to duplicate or split functionality into test_progs.c instead.

No strong feelings but if it's called test_verifier, and the sample puts
no stress on the verifier it feels weird to put it there..  But okay, I
will respin.. at some point :)