[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51b935de-18d4-fcd5-a858-2bb8ccca484e@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:30:53 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: phy: warn if phy_start is called
from invalid state
On 21.01.2019 19:29, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> For all invalid states phy_start() basically was a no-op. All it did was
>> triggering a state machine run, but for all "running" states the poll
>> loop was active anyway. And if called from PHY_DOWN, the state machine
>> does nothing. Therefore I see no scenario where jumping to out would
>> break anything.
>
> Hi Heiner
>
> It is useful to put this sort of analysis in the commit message. You
> then won't get people like me asking about it.
>
Will add this to my "best practices" list ;)
> Andrew
>
Heiner
Powered by blists - more mailing lists