[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1548375028-8308-5-git-send-email-jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:10:16 -0500
From: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
To: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/16] bpf: disassembler support JMP32
This patch teaches disassembler about JMP32. There are two places to
update:
- Class 0x6 now used by BPF_JMP32, not "unused".
- BPF_JMP32 need to show comparison operands properly.
The disassemble format is to add an extra "(32)" before the operands if
it is a sub-register. A better disassemble format for both JMP32 and
ALU32 just show the register prefix as "w" instead of "r", this is the
format using by LLVM assembler.
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
---
kernel/bpf/disasm.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
index d6b7637..de73f55 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ const char *const bpf_class_string[8] = {
[BPF_STX] = "stx",
[BPF_ALU] = "alu",
[BPF_JMP] = "jmp",
- [BPF_RET] = "BUG",
+ [BPF_JMP32] = "jmp32",
[BPF_ALU64] = "alu64",
};
@@ -136,23 +136,22 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
else
print_bpf_end_insn(verbose, cbs->private_data, insn);
} else if (BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_NEG) {
- verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) r%d = %s-r%d\n",
- insn->code, insn->dst_reg,
- class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
+ verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) %c%d = -%c%d\n",
+ insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? 'w' : 'r',
+ insn->dst_reg, class == BPF_ALU ? 'w' : 'r',
insn->dst_reg);
} else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
- verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) %sr%d %s %sr%d\n",
- insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
+ verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) %c%d %s %c%d\n",
+ insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? 'w' : 'r',
insn->dst_reg,
bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4],
- class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
+ class == BPF_ALU ? 'w' : 'r',
insn->src_reg);
} else {
- verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) %sr%d %s %s%d\n",
- insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
+ verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) %c%d %s %d\n",
+ insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? 'w' : 'r',
insn->dst_reg,
bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4],
- class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
insn->imm);
}
} else if (class == BPF_STX) {
@@ -220,7 +219,7 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
verbose(cbs->private_data, "BUG_ld_%02x\n", insn->code);
return;
}
- } else if (class == BPF_JMP) {
+ } else if (class == BPF_JMP32 || class == BPF_JMP) {
u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
if (opcode == BPF_CALL) {
@@ -244,13 +243,18 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
} else if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT)) {
verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) exit\n", insn->code);
} else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
- verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) if r%d %s r%d goto pc%+d\n",
- insn->code, insn->dst_reg,
+ verbose(cbs->private_data,
+ "(%02x) if %c%d %s %c%d goto pc%+d\n",
+ insn->code, class == BPF_JMP32 ? 'w' : 'r',
+ insn->dst_reg,
bpf_jmp_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4],
+ class == BPF_JMP32 ? 'w' : 'r',
insn->src_reg, insn->off);
} else {
- verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) if r%d %s 0x%x goto pc%+d\n",
- insn->code, insn->dst_reg,
+ verbose(cbs->private_data,
+ "(%02x) if %c%d %s 0x%x goto pc%+d\n",
+ insn->code, class == BPF_JMP32 ? 'w' : 'r',
+ insn->dst_reg,
bpf_jmp_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4],
insn->imm, insn->off);
}
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists