lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:32:02 +0000
From:   Eli Britstein <elibr@...lanox.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "pshelar@....org" <pshelar@....org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "blp@....org" <blp@....org>,
        "dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
        Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
        "simon.horman@...ronome.com" <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] openvswitch: Declare ovs key structures
 using macros

ping

for the using patch, i put below the v1 of it. here is v2:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1023406/


On 1/27/2019 8:37 AM, Eli Britstein wrote:
>
> On 1/27/2019 1:04 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eli Britstein <elibr@...lanox.com>
>> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:46:47 +0200
>>
>>> Declare ovs key structures using macros to enable retrieving fields
>>> information, with no functional change.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein <elibr@...lanox.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
>> I agree with Pravin, this need a much better commit message.
>>
>> Maybe even better to submit this alongside whatever is supposed
>> to use these new macros.
>
> This patch is equivalent to a work done in the OVS tree.
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1023405/
>
> As a standalone it doesn't serve any purpose (as mentioned - no 
> functional change).
>
> It serves as a pre-step towards another patch in the OVS:
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1022794/
>
> So, the purpose of doing it in the kernel is just to keep this H file 
> identical. Once it is approved for the kernel, we will be able to 
> proceed with it in the OVS.
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ