[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2f6fa7e-49c3-cb3f-43eb-8ab248b0bb63@enneenne.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 08:54:01 +0100
From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug into DSA2 code.
On 19/02/2019 01:03, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
>> index 54a5b660640a..bb46ebbb2bb8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
>> @@ -2399,7 +2399,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>> int i;
>>
>> chip->ds = ds;
>> - ds->slave_mii_bus = mv88e6xxx_default_mdio_bus(chip);
>> + ds->slave_mii_bus = NULL;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&chip->reg_lock);
>>
>> Is that right?
>
> Hi Rodolfo
>
> Humm, that needs testing. There are two used combinations you need to
> test:
>
> No MDIO node in device tree, e.g.
> arch/arm/boot/dts/kirkwood-dir665.dts
>
> MDIO node in device tree, e.g:
> arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-dev-rev-b.dts
I'm sorry but I haven't such boards... :'(
> There is a third combination which will appear soon. There is only the
> external mdio bus in device tree:
>
> port@9 {
> reg = <9>;
> label = "eth_cu_1000_2";
> phy-handle = <&phy9>;
> phy-mode = "sgmii";
> managed = "in-band-status";
> };
> };
>
> mdio1 {
> compatible = "marvell,mv88e6xxx-mdio-external";
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> phy9: phy9@0 {
> compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45";
> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_gpio_phy9>;
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>;
> interrupts = <30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> reg = <0>;
> };
> };
>
> Here port 9 uses the external MDIO bus and all the other ports
> implicitly make use of the internal MDIO bus.
Mmm... maybe should code into drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx use private data to hold
used mdio busses instead of ds->slave_mii_bus pointer?
Ciao,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@...eenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti@...ux.it
Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming skype: rodolfo.giometti
Powered by blists - more mailing lists