netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 01/13] lib: Add support for generic packing operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:13:55 -0700
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 01/13] lib: Add support for generic packing
 operations

On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 10:32:03PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> I didn't want to pollute LKML with the entire driver patchset from the
> get-go, just receive some initial feedback from netdev first (hence the
> RFC).
> How should I proceed? Should I resend just this patch to LKML, or a v2
> patchset with LKML copied on the lib patch?

I would send the entire series, so that the context is clear.

(There is no danger of polluting lkml ;^)

Thanks,
Richard