netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: switch drivers to use dynamic feature detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ed1679cd-42b4-df7d-e72f-a734bee8d675@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 7 Apr 2019 22:48:35 +0200
From:   Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:     bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: switch drivers to use dynamic feature
 detection

On 07.04.2019 22:31, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/7/2019 2:57 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Recently genphy_read_abilities() has been added that dynamically detects
>> clause 22 PHY abilities. I *think* this detection should work with all
>> supported PHY's, at least for the ones with basic features sets, i.e.
>> PHY_BASIC_FEATURES and PHY_GBIT_FEATURES. So let's remove setting these
>> features explicitly and rely on phylib feature detection.
>>
>> I don't have access to most of these PHY's, therefore I'd appreciate
>> regression testing.
> 
> The nice thing about the features is that we can right away tell which
> PHY entries are Fast Ethernet/Gigabit etc... so if you remove that
> assignment, we would need at least a standardized comment allowing us to
> quickly grep for that information.
> 
Yes, that gets lost. Well, in a lot (most?) of cases you still have it in
the name. But who needs this information what for? At runtime e.g. ethtool
tells what's supported. And for all PHY's w/o dedicated driver that are
using the genphy driver you don't know anyway.
For c45 PHY's this would become even more tricky as they can support much
more speeds.