lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 08 Apr 2019 15:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     lucasb@...atatu.com
Cc:     nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, jiri@...lanox.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bjb@...atatu.com, kleib@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: add a tc matchall test case

From: Lucas Bates <lucasb@...atatu.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 18:24:08 -0400

> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 10:32 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> > I'm not sure to understand the goal of this series:
>> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/?h=45b3a3762721
>> >
>> > But after it, tc selftests are not intuitive anymore. When naively running them
>> > (./tdy.py), all fw filter tests fail. It's hard to understand that the problem
>> > is that they require the 'nsPlugin' plugin to be enabled (by adding a symlink
>> > *and* providing the '-n' option to tdc.py).
>> >
>> > Brenda, why putting the netns code into a plugin that is disabled by default,
>> > knowing that this code is mandatory to run the test?
>>
>> Brenda, please respond.
> 
> This would be a documentation issue - the usage of nsPlugin is not
> covered in the README.  I'll submit a patch by end of the day tomorrow
> to address it.
> 
> The namespace code isn't mandatory, strictly speaking.  It's not
> required at all when running the action tests, only with the filter
> tests as those need a specific device to be attached to.
> 
> The actual problem is that the nsPlugin creates a veth pair using the
> names found in the config file (DEV0/DEV1) - but if you aren't using
> the plugin, then a port won't be created.  The intention is that you'd
> create a port manually before starting the tests.

That's poor behavior.

If I just want to run all the tests, I should be able to just execute
the script with no special arguments.

This setup sucks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ