lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be9bb84c-6c0c-3106-ccbb-99b15ad5b30e@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 May 2019 10:21:26 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] net: phy: tja11xx: Add TJA11xx PHY driver

On May 18, 2019 9:50:48 AM PDT, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de> wrote:
>On 5/18/19 4:14 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 01:51:23AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Add driver for the NXP TJA1100 and TJA1101 PHYs. These PHYs are
>special
>>> BroadRReach 100BaseT1 PHYs used in automotive.
>> 
>> Hi Marek
>
>Hello Andrew,
>
>>> +	}, {
>>> +		PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_TJA1101),
>>> +		.name		= "NXP TJA1101",
>>> +		.features       = PHY_BASIC_T1_FEATURES,
>> 
>> One thing i would like to do before this patch goes in is define
>> ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT1_Full_BIT in ethtool.h, and use it here.
>> We could not do it earlier because were ran out of bits. But with
>> PHYLIB now using bitmaps, rather than u32, we can.
>> 
>> Once net-next reopens i will submit a patch adding it.
>
>I can understand blocking patches from being applied if they have
>review
>problems or need to be updated on some existing or even posted feature.
>But blocking a patch because some future yet-to-be-developed patch is a
>bit odd.
>

The net-next tree is currently closed which means there is ample time
for you and Andrew to work offline and have you submit both Andrew's
cleanup patches as well as this very one as a patch series when net-next
opens back up giving both of you your own cookies. Once submitted it
won't take weeks to get merged more like hours given David's typical
review and patch acceptance time.
--
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ