[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEA6p_BHrHUAgF_Ca4=zRc2iH6WBOGPkLK+a3_h43zmn6uZKWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 17:11:09 -0700
From: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
idosch@...lanox.com, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 09/20] ipv6: Handle all fib6_nh in a nexthop
in rt6_do_redirect
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 4:06 PM David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
>
> Use nexthop_for_each_fib6_nh and fib6_nh_find_match to find the
> fib6_nh in a nexthop that correlates to the device and gateway
> in the rt6_info.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/route.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index 2eb6754c6d11..1c6cff699a76 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -3903,7 +3903,25 @@ static void rt6_do_redirect(struct dst_entry *dst, struct sock *sk, struct sk_bu
> if (!res.f6i)
> goto out;
>
> - res.nh = res.f6i->fib6_nh;
> + if (res.f6i->nh) {
> + struct fib6_nh_match_arg arg = {
> + .dev = dst->dev,
> + .gw = &rt->rt6i_gateway,
> + };
> +
> + nexthop_for_each_fib6_nh(res.f6i->nh,
> + fib6_nh_find_match, &arg);
> +
> + /* fib6_info uses a nexthop that does not have fib6_nh
> + * using the dst->dev. Should be impossible
> + */
> + if (!arg.match)
> + return;
I don't think you can directly return here. We are still holding
rcu_read_lock() here. Probably need "goto out"...
> + res.nh = arg.match;
> + } else {
> + res.nh = res.f6i->fib6_nh;
> + }
> +
> res.fib6_flags = res.f6i->fib6_flags;
> res.fib6_type = res.f6i->fib6_type;
> nrt = ip6_rt_cache_alloc(&res, &msg->dest, NULL);
> --
> 2.11.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists