netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] net: Reorder the contents of skb_frag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <681207979b3e5db22193e841a54139b3f5a2771c.camel@mellanox.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:55:21 +0000
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To:     "willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>
CC:     "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] net: Reorder the contents of skb_frag_t

On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 18:28 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:29:06PM +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-07-12 at 06:43 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
> > > 
> > > Match the layout of bio_vec.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/skbuff.h | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > > index 7910935410e6..b9dc8b4f24b1 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > > @@ -314,8 +314,8 @@ struct skb_frag_struct {
> > >  	struct {
> > >  		struct page *p;
> > >  	} page;
> > > -	__u32 page_offset;
> > >  	__u32 size;
> > > +	__u32 page_offset;
> > >  };
> > >  
> > 
> > Why do you need this patch? this struct is going to be removed
> > downstream eventually ..
> 
> If there's a performance regression, this is the perfect patch to
> include
> as part of the bisection.  You'd think that this change could have no
> effect, but I've seen weirder things.

ok make sense !