[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191031182835.0451d472@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:28:35 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
OSS Drivers <oss-drivers@...ronome.com>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [oss-drivers] Re: [PATCH bpf-next] Revert "selftests: bpf:
Don't try to read files without read permission"
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:56:46 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 5:51 PM Jakub Kicinski
> <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> wrote:
> >
> > This reverts commit 5bc60de50dfe ("selftests: bpf: Don't try to read
> > files without read permission").
> >
> > Quoted commit does not work at all, and was never tested.
> > Script requires root permissions (and tests for them)
> > and os.access() will always return true for root.
> >
> > The correct fix is needed in the bpf tree, so let's just
> > revert and save ourselves the merge conflict.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
>
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Since original commit is broken may be apply directly to net-next ?
> I'm fine whichever way.
I'm 3 fixes down to get test_offloads.py to work again. One for
cls_bpf, one for the test itself and one for net/core/dev.c logic.
Should I target all those at net?
Are you and Daniel running test_offloads.py? It looks like it lots of
things slipped in since I last run it :(
> I would wait for Jiri to reply first though.
Not sure what he can contribute at this point but sure :/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists