netdev - Re: [oss-drivers] Re: [PATCH bpf-next] Revert "selftests: bpf: Don't try to read files without read permission"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 Nov 2019 07:38:55 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        OSS Drivers <oss-drivers@...ronome.com>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [oss-drivers] Re: [PATCH bpf-next] Revert "selftests: bpf: Don't
 try to read files without read permission"

Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 02:28:35AM CET, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com wrote:
>On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:56:46 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 5:51 PM Jakub Kicinski
>> <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > This reverts commit 5bc60de50dfe ("selftests: bpf: Don't try to read
>> > files without read permission").
>> >
>> > Quoted commit does not work at all, and was never tested.
>> > Script requires root permissions (and tests for them)
>> > and os.access() will always return true for root.
>> >
>> > The correct fix is needed in the bpf tree, so let's just
>> > revert and save ourselves the merge conflict.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>  
>> 
>> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
>> Since original commit is broken may be apply directly to net-next ?
>> I'm fine whichever way.
>
>I'm 3 fixes down to get test_offloads.py to work again. One for
>cls_bpf, one for the test itself and one for net/core/dev.c logic.
>Should I target all those at net?
>
>Are you and Daniel running test_offloads.py?  It looks like it lots of
>things slipped in since I last run it :(
>
>> I would wait for Jiri to reply first though.
>
>Not sure what he can contribute at this point but sure :/

I'm okay with Jakub taking care of the fix. Thanks!