lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe57af03-c42d-0f87-b712-30c5048764ad@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Fri, 1 Nov 2019 13:10:13 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] fix BPF offload related bugs

On 11/1/19 4:06 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> test_offload.py catches some recently added bugs.
> 
> First of a bug in test_offload.py itself after recent changes
> to netdevsim is fixed.
> 
> Second patch fixes a bug in cls_bpf, and last one addresses
> a problem with the recently added XDP installation optimization.
> 
> Jakub Kicinski (3):
>    selftests: bpf: Skip write only files in debugfs
>    net: cls_bpf: fix NULL deref on offload filter removal
>    net: fix installing orphaned programs
> 
>   net/core/dev.c                              | 3 ++-
>   net/sched/cls_bpf.c                         | 8 ++++++--
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py | 5 +++++
>   3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Should this go via -bpf or -net? Either way is fine, but asking
given it's BPF related fixes; planning to do a PR in the evening,
set looks good to me in any case.

Thanks,
Daniel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ