lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 13:10:13 +0100 From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>, davem@...emloft.net Cc: alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] fix BPF offload related bugs On 11/1/19 4:06 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Hi! > > test_offload.py catches some recently added bugs. > > First of a bug in test_offload.py itself after recent changes > to netdevsim is fixed. > > Second patch fixes a bug in cls_bpf, and last one addresses > a problem with the recently added XDP installation optimization. > > Jakub Kicinski (3): > selftests: bpf: Skip write only files in debugfs > net: cls_bpf: fix NULL deref on offload filter removal > net: fix installing orphaned programs > > net/core/dev.c | 3 ++- > net/sched/cls_bpf.c | 8 ++++++-- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py | 5 +++++ > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Should this go via -bpf or -net? Either way is fine, but asking given it's BPF related fixes; planning to do a PR in the evening, set looks good to me in any case. Thanks, Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists