[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe57af03-c42d-0f87-b712-30c5048764ad@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 13:10:13 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] fix BPF offload related bugs
On 11/1/19 4:06 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Hi!
>
> test_offload.py catches some recently added bugs.
>
> First of a bug in test_offload.py itself after recent changes
> to netdevsim is fixed.
>
> Second patch fixes a bug in cls_bpf, and last one addresses
> a problem with the recently added XDP installation optimization.
>
> Jakub Kicinski (3):
> selftests: bpf: Skip write only files in debugfs
> net: cls_bpf: fix NULL deref on offload filter removal
> net: fix installing orphaned programs
>
> net/core/dev.c | 3 ++-
> net/sched/cls_bpf.c | 8 ++++++--
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Should this go via -bpf or -net? Either way is fine, but asking
given it's BPF related fixes; planning to do a PR in the evening,
set looks good to me in any case.
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists