[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191112145054.GG10875@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 15:50:54 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Allan W. Nielsen" <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Joergen Andreasen <joergen.andreasen@...rochip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/12] net: dsa: vitesse: move vsc73xx driver to
a separate folder
> > > As there are no commonalities between the vsc73xx and felix drivers,
> > > shouldn't you simply leave that one out and have felix in the existing
> > > microchip folder?
> > >
> >
> > I don't have a strong preference, although where I come from, all new
> > NXP networking drivers are still labeled as "freescale" even though
> > there is no code reuse. There are even less commonalities with
> > Microchip (ex-Micrel, if I am not mistaken) KSZ switches than with the
> > old vsc73xx. I'll let the ex-Vitesse people decide.
> I'm on the same page as Alexandre here.
Leaving them where they are makes maintenance easier. Fixes are easier
to backport if things don't move around.
> I think we should leave vsc73xx where it is already, and put the felix driver in
> the drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ folder where ocelot is already.
Currently, all DSA drivers are in drivers/net/dsa. We do occasionally
make changes over all DSA drivers at once, so it is nice they are all
together. So i would prefer the DSA part of Felix is also there. But
the core can be in drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists