netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 03/14] net: sfp: add more extended compliance codes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191210165716.GI27714@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:57:16 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 03/14] net: sfp: add more extended compliance
 codes

On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 03:18:39PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> SFF-8024 is used to define various constants re-used in several SFF
> SFP-related specifications.  Split these constants from the enum, and
> rename them to indicate that they're defined by SFF-8024.
> 
> Add and use updated SFF-8024 extended compliance code definitions for
> 10GBASE-T, 5GBASE-T and 2.5GBASE-T modules.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>

> +	case SFF8024_CONNECTOR_SG: /* guess */

Does SFF8024 say anything about this, or is it still a guess?

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew