[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191211164754.GB1616641@t480s.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:47:54 -0500
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, dsahern@...il.com,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: bridge: add STP xstats
Hi David,
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:01:20 -0800 (PST), David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> >> >> /* Bridge multicast database attributes
> >> >> * [MDBA_MDB] = {
> >> >> * [MDBA_MDB_ENTRY] = {
> >> >> @@ -261,6 +270,7 @@ enum {
> >> >> BRIDGE_XSTATS_UNSPEC,
> >> >> BRIDGE_XSTATS_VLAN,
> >> >> BRIDGE_XSTATS_MCAST,
> >> >> + BRIDGE_XSTATS_STP,
> >> >> BRIDGE_XSTATS_PAD,
> >> >> __BRIDGE_XSTATS_MAX
> >> >> };
> >> >
> >> > Shouldn't the new entry be appended to the end - after BRIDGE_XSTATS_PAD
> >> >
> >>
> >> Oh yes, good catch. That has to be fixed, too.
> >>
> >
> > This I don't get. Why new attributes must come between BRIDGE_XSTATS_PAD
> > and __BRIDGE_XSTATS_MAX?
>
> Because, just like any other attribute value, BRIDGE_XSTATS_PAD is an
> API and fixed in stone. You can't add things before it which change
> it's value.
I thought the whole point of using enums was to avoid caring about fixed
numeric values, but well. To be more precise, what I don't get is that when
I move the BRIDGE_XSTATS_STP definition *after* BRIDGE_XSTATS_PAD, the STP
xstats don't show up anymore in iproute2.
Thanks,
Vivien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists