[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200127175145.1154438-1-kafai@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:51:45 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <kernel-team@...com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Reuse log from btf_prase_vmlinux() in btf_struct_ops_init()
Instead of using a locally defined "struct bpf_verifier_log log = {}",
btf_struct_ops_init() should reuse the "log" from its calling
function "btf_parse_vmlinux()". It should also resolve the
frame-size too large compiler warning in some ARCH.
Fixes: 27ae7997a661 ("bpf: Introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 7 +++++--
kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 5 ++---
kernel/bpf/btf.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 8e9ad3943cd9..49b1a70e12c8 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops {
#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) && defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL)
#define BPF_MODULE_OWNER ((void *)((0xeB9FUL << 2) + POISON_POINTER_DELTA))
const struct bpf_struct_ops *bpf_struct_ops_find(u32 type_id);
-void bpf_struct_ops_init(struct btf *btf);
+void bpf_struct_ops_init(struct btf *btf, struct bpf_verifier_log *log);
bool bpf_struct_ops_get(const void *kdata);
void bpf_struct_ops_put(const void *kdata);
int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
@@ -752,7 +752,10 @@ static inline const struct bpf_struct_ops *bpf_struct_ops_find(u32 type_id)
{
return NULL;
}
-static inline void bpf_struct_ops_init(struct btf *btf) { }
+static inline void bpf_struct_ops_init(struct btf *btf,
+ struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
+{
+}
static inline bool bpf_try_module_get(const void *data, struct module *owner)
{
return try_module_get(owner);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index 8ad1c9ea26b2..042f95534f86 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -96,12 +96,11 @@ const struct bpf_prog_ops bpf_struct_ops_prog_ops = {
static const struct btf_type *module_type;
-void bpf_struct_ops_init(struct btf *btf)
+void bpf_struct_ops_init(struct btf *btf, struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
{
s32 type_id, value_id, module_id;
const struct btf_member *member;
struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops;
- struct bpf_verifier_log log = {};
const struct btf_type *t;
char value_name[128];
const char *mname;
@@ -172,7 +171,7 @@ void bpf_struct_ops_init(struct btf *btf)
member->type,
NULL);
if (func_proto &&
- btf_distill_func_proto(&log, btf,
+ btf_distill_func_proto(log, btf,
func_proto, mname,
&st_ops->func_models[j])) {
pr_warn("Error in parsing func ptr %s in struct %s\n",
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index b7c1660fb594..8c9d8f266bef 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -3643,7 +3643,7 @@ struct btf *btf_parse_vmlinux(void)
goto errout;
}
- bpf_struct_ops_init(btf);
+ bpf_struct_ops_init(btf, log);
btf_verifier_env_free(env);
refcount_set(&btf->refcnt, 1);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists