netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/10] net: dsa: improve serdes integration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200306011310.GC2450@lunn.ch>
Date:   Fri, 6 Mar 2020 02:13:10 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/10] net: dsa: improve serdes integration

> FYI, the port status and control register for the CPU port on the
> ZII rev C should be:
> 
> 0 = 0xd04
> 1 = 0x203d

Hi Russell

I've been testing Devel C, port lan1. So port 1 on the first switch.

net-next/master from a few hours ago ping's out that interface.  So
the CPU/DSA phylink breakage is not part of this problem.

net-next/master + this patchset no longer pings.

Register dump for the CPU port shows:

0: 0e04
1: 203d

The e indicates 1000Mbs, where as it should be 100Mbs. However, as i
said, the datasheet suggests this might not be a problem?

I will try to figure out which patch broke it.

  Andrew