[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02ad5abe-8a1c-8e39-3c8e-e78c3186ef79@ucloud.cn>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:14:06 +0800
From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net/mlx5e: add mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_ft_cb
support
On 12/18/2019 3:54 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 10:41 +0800, wenxu wrote:
>> On 12/10/2019 7:44 PM, Paul Blakey wrote:
>>> On 12/10/2019 12:08 PM, wenxu@...oud.cn wrote:
>>>> From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
>>>>
>>>> Add mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_ft_cb to support indr block setup
>>>> in FT mode.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
>>>> ---
> [...]
>
>>> +cc Saeed
>>>
>>>
>>> This looks good to me, but it should be on top of a patch that
>>> will
>>> actual allows the indirect BIND if the nft
>>>
>>> table device is a tunnel device. Is that upstream? If so which
>>> patch?
>>>
>>>
>>> Currently (5.5.0-rc1+), nft_register_flowtable_net_hooks calls
>>> nf_flow_table_offload_setup which will see
>>>
>>> that the tunnel device doesn't have ndo_setup_tc and return
>>> -EOPNOTSUPPORTED.
>> The related patch http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1206935/
>>
>> is waiting for upstream
>>
> The netfilter patch is still under-review, once accepted i will apply
> this series.
>
> Thanks,
> Saeed.
>
Hi Saeed,
Sorry for so long time to update. The netfilter patch is already accepted. This series is also
not out of date and can apply to net-next. If you feel ok please apply it thanks.
The netfilter patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1242815/
BR
wenxu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists