[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99c75f39-1f27-ad3c-1605-397b69760d07@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:46:41 +0200
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
CC: <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: Mark timer used by delayed kthread works as IRQ
safe
Hi All,
On 16/03/2020 14:23, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> On 19/02/2020 17:22, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 01:07:09PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
>>> The timer used by delayed kthread works are IRQ safe because the used
>>> kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn() is IRQ safe.
>>>
>>> It is properly marked when initialized by KTHREAD_DELAYED_WORK_INIT().
>>> But TIMER_IRQSAFE flag is missing when initialized by
>>> kthread_init_delayed_work().
>>>
>>> The missing flag might trigger invalid warning from del_timer_sync()
>>> when kthread_mod_delayed_work() is called with interrupts disabled.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>>> Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>
> I'm worry shouldn't this patch have "fixes" tag?
>
Sorry, the I'm disturbing you, but I have dependency from this path [1].
I can see it in -next: commit d7c8c7de96de ("kthread: mark timer used by
delayed kthread works as IRQ safe"), but it does not present in net-next.
Any way this can be resolved?
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1259207/
--
Best regards,
grygorii
Powered by blists - more mailing lists