netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/4] Cross-chip bridging for disjoint DSA trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200507.151535.889895250031586890.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 07 May 2020 15:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     olteanv@...il.com
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        jiri@...nulli.us, idosch@...sch.org, kuba@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, mingkai.hu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/4] Cross-chip bridging for disjoint DSA
 trees

From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 19:07:32 +0300

> What does it mean that this series is "deferred" in patchwork?

I need it to be reviewed, nobody reviewed it for days so I just toss
it in the deferred state.

I don't feel comfortable applying this without Andrew/Florian's
review, but if that doesn't happen I don't want this series clogging
up my backlog so I toss it because you can always repost after
some time.