netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/4] Cross-chip bridging for disjoint DSA trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cc18bf9c-a182-f182-1dbb-40f547a0abfa@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 May 2020 15:36:02 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, olteanv@...il.com
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
        idosch@...sch.org, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
        mingkai.hu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/4] Cross-chip bridging for disjoint DSA
 trees



On 5/7/2020 3:15 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 19:07:32 +0300
> 
>> What does it mean that this series is "deferred" in patchwork?
> 
> I need it to be reviewed, nobody reviewed it for days so I just toss
> it in the deferred state.
> 
> I don't feel comfortable applying this without Andrew/Florian's
> review, but if that doesn't happen I don't want this series clogging
> up my backlog so I toss it because you can always repost after
> some time.

I should be able to review those patches later today and give them a
spin too.
-- 
Florian