[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200511073912.GB12725@lsv03152.swis.in-blr01.nxp.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 13:09:12 +0530
From: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux.cj@...il.com, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
Florin Laurentiu Chiculita <florinlaurentiu.chiculita@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@....com>,
"Rajesh V . Bikkina" <rajesh.bikkina@....com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Diana Madalina Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Makarand Pawagi <makarand.pawagi@....com>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 4/5] net: phy: Introduce fwnode_get_phy_id()
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 05:48:33PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5/8/20 3:27 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > There is a very small number of devices where the vendor messed up,
> > > > and did not put valid contents in the ID registers. In such cases, we
> > > > can read the IDs from device tree. These are then used in exactly the
> > > > same way as if they were read from the device.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Is that the case here?
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understand the question?
>
> I was asking in general, does this machine report the ID's correctly. More
> directed at Calvin, but part of it is the board vendor too. So I suspect no
> one can really answer "yes", despite that seeming to be the case.
I had tested RGMII PHYs(AR8035) with c22 using mdiobus_register. Vendor ID was
read out correctly while autoprobing.
AQR107(c45) PHYs that were connected gave back 0x00. This is expected
because the MDIO bus is configured to talk c22.
Regards
Calvin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists