[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ+HfNgE5TTFfGa-XNS7_=ukcNJ=jMUoBLmmA_c=iVY3C_DXZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 19:19:22 +0200
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...lanox.com>,
"Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/15] i40e: separate kernel allocated rx_bi
rings from AF_XDP rings
On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 19:02, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 May 2020 11:47:34 +0200 Björn Töpel wrote:
> > From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
> >
> > Continuing the path to support MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL, the AF_XDP
> > zero-copy/sk_buff rx_bi rings are now separate. Functions to properly
> > allocate the different rings are added as well.
> >
> > v3->v4: Made i40e_fd_handle_status() static. (kbuild test robot)
> >
> > Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
> > Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
>
> There is a new warning here, at least one. But i40e has so many
> existing warnings with W=1, I can't figure out which one is new :(
>
> You most likely forgot to adjust kdoc somewhere after adding or
> removing a function parameter.
Hmm, yes. A lot of warnings there. I'll see if I can find it. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists