[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4158adb2a6a49cd652f3ad47d59f2a976b6c1d18.1590864517.git.gnault@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 20:49:56 +0200
From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] cls_flower: remove mpls_opts_policy
Compiling with W=1 gives the following warning:
net/sched/cls_flower.c:731:1: warning: ‘mpls_opts_policy’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
The TCA_FLOWER_KEY_MPLS_OPTS contains a list of
TCA_FLOWER_KEY_MPLS_OPTS_LSE. Therefore, the attributes all have the
same type and we can't parse the list with nla_parse*() and have the
attributes validated automatically using an nla_policy.
fl_set_key_mpls_opts() properly verifies that all attributes in the
list are TCA_FLOWER_KEY_MPLS_OPTS_LSE. Then fl_set_key_mpls_lse()
uses nla_parse_nested() on all these attributes, thus verifying that
they have the NLA_F_NESTED flag. So we can safely drop the
mpls_opts_policy.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
---
net/sched/cls_flower.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_flower.c b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
index 96f5999281e0..8f010cff03a6 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_flower.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
@@ -727,11 +727,6 @@ erspan_opt_policy[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ENC_OPT_ERSPAN_MAX + 1] = {
[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ENC_OPT_ERSPAN_HWID] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
};
-static const struct nla_policy
-mpls_opts_policy[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_MPLS_OPTS_MAX + 1] = {
- [TCA_FLOWER_KEY_MPLS_OPTS_LSE] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
-};
-
static const struct nla_policy
mpls_stack_entry_policy[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_MPLS_OPT_LSE_MAX + 1] = {
[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_MPLS_OPT_LSE_DEPTH] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
--
2.21.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists