lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:01:29 +0200
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@....com>
Cc:     dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-can-next/flexcan 1/4] can: flexcan: initialize all
 flexcan memory for ECC function

On 9/28/20 4:27 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
>> If it's OK on all SoCs to initialize the complete RAM area, just do it. Then we can
>> get rid of the proposed struct at all.
> 
> Should be OK according to IP guys feedbacks.

Good!

> static const struct flexcan_devtype_data fsl_vf610_devtype_data = {
> 	.quirks = FLEXCAN_QUIRK_DISABLE_RXFG | FLEXCAN_QUIRK_ENABLE_EACEN_RRS |
> 		FLEXCAN_QUIRK_DISABLE_MECR | FLEXCAN_QUIRK_USE_OFF_TIMESTAMP |
> 		FLEXCAN_QUIRK_BROKEN_PERR_STATE,
> };
> 
> static const struct flexcan_devtype_data fsl_ls1021a_r2_devtype_data = {
> 	.quirks = FLEXCAN_QUIRK_DISABLE_RXFG | FLEXCAN_QUIRK_ENABLE_EACEN_RRS |
> 		FLEXCAN_QUIRK_DISABLE_MECR | FLEXCAN_QUIRK_BROKEN_PERR_STATE |
> 		FLEXCAN_QUIRK_USE_OFF_TIMESTAMP,
> };
> 
> static const struct flexcan_devtype_data fsl_lx2160a_r1_devtype_data = {
> 	.quirks = FLEXCAN_QUIRK_DISABLE_RXFG | FLEXCAN_QUIRK_ENABLE_EACEN_RRS |
> 		FLEXCAN_QUIRK_DISABLE_MECR | FLEXCAN_QUIRK_BROKEN_PERR_STATE |
> 		FLEXCAN_QUIRK_USE_OFF_TIMESTAMP | FLEXCAN_QUIRK_SUPPORT_FD,
> };

> I am checking layerscape's CAN section:
> 
> There is no ECC section in LS1021A 
> https://www.nxp.com/products/processors-and-microcontrollers/arm-processors/layerscape-multicore-processors/layerscape-1021a-dual-core-communications-processor-with-lcd-controller:LS1021A?tab=Documentation_Tab

Hmmm, why does the LS1021A have "FLEXCAN_QUIRK_DISABLE_MECR"? The bits in the
ctrl2 and the mecr register itself used in the quirk are marked as reserved in
this datasheet....

Can @Pankaj Bansal clarify this?

> ECC section in LX2160A, also contains the same NOTE as i.MX8MP.
> https://www.nxp.com/products/processors-and-microcontrollers/arm-processors/layerscape-multicore-processors/layerscape-lx2160a-multicore-communications-processor:LX2160A?tab=Documentation_Tab

> Hi @Pankaj Bansal, could you please also have a check?
Can someone check the vf610, too?

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ