netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2 2/2] tc: implement support for terse dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87d01r1hi8.fsf@buslov.dev>
Date:   Fri, 09 Oct 2020 19:38:55 +0300
From:   Vlad Buslov <vlad@...lov.dev>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>,
        stephen@...workplumber.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...nulli.us,
        ivecera@...hat.com, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2 2/2] tc: implement support for terse dump


On Fri 09 Oct 2020 at 15:45, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> On 2020-10-09 8:15 a.m., Vlad Buslov wrote:
>>
>> On Fri 09 Oct 2020 at 15:03, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>
>>> Which test(s)?
>>> I see for example d45e mentioning terse but i dont see corresponding
>>> code in the iproute2 tree i just pulled.
>>
>> Yes. The tests d45e and 7c65 were added as a part of kernel series, but
>> corresponding iproute2 patches were never merged. Tests expect original
>> "terse flag" syntax of V1 iproute2 series and will have to be changed to
>> use -brief option instead.
>
> Then i dont see a problem in changing the tests.
> If you are going to send a v3 please include my acked-by.
> Would have been nice to see what terse output would have looked like.
>
> cheers,
> jamal

Sure. Just waiting for everyone to voice their opinion regarding the
output format before proceeding with any changes.