[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f510e3b5-b856-e1a0-3c2b-149b85f9588f@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 09:34:53 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
Subject: Re: [iproute2-next v3] devlink: display elapsed time during flash
update
On 10/14/20 4:31 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> For some devices, updating the flash can take significant time during
> operations where no status can meaningfully be reported. This can be
> somewhat confusing to a user who sees devlink appear to hang on the
> terminal waiting for the device to update.
>
> Recent changes to the kernel interface allow such long running commands
> to provide a timeout value indicating some upper bound on how long the
> relevant action could take.
>
> Provide a ticking counter of the time elapsed since the previous status
> message in order to make it clear that the program is not simply stuck.
>
> Display this message whenever the status message from the kernel
> indicates a timeout value. Additionally also display the message if
> we've received no status for more than couple of seconds. If we elapse
> more than the timeout provided by the status message, replace the
> timeout display with "timeout reached".
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2
> * use clock_gettime on CLOCK_MONOTONIC instead of gettimeofday
> * remove use of timersub since we're now using struct timespec
>
> devlink/devlink.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
applied to iproute2-next.
The DEVLINK attributes are ridiculously long --
DEVLINK_ATTR_FLASH_UPDATE_STATUS_TIMEOUT is 40 characters -- which
forces really long code lines or oddly wrapped lines. Going forward
please consider abbreviations on name components to reduce their lengths.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists