[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210112221632.611c8a7e@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 22:16:32 +0100
From: Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pavana.sharma@...i.com,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
lkp@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, ashkan.boldaji@...i.com,
andrew@...n.ch, Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v15 5/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for
mv88e6393x family of Marvell
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 22:38:08 +0200
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
> > + phylink_set(mask, 10000baseT_Full);
> > + phylink_set(mask, 10000baseCR_Full);
> > + phylink_set(mask, 10000baseSR_Full);
> > + phylink_set(mask, 10000baseLR_Full);
> > + phylink_set(mask, 10000baseLRM_Full);
> > + phylink_set(mask, 10000baseER_Full);
>
> Why did you remove 1000baseKR_Full from here?
I am confused now. Should 1000baseKR_Full be here? 10g-kr is 10g-r with
clause 73 autonegotiation, so they are not compatible, or are they?
Marek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists