[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210126173417.3123c8ea@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:34:17 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
edwin.peer@...adcom.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
dsahern@...nel.org, kiran.patil@...el.com,
david.m.ertman@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [pull request][net-next V10 00/14] Add mlx5 subfunction support
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:36:44 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> This series form Parav was the theme of this mlx5 release cycle,
> we've been waiting anxiously for the auxbus infrastructure to make it into
> the kernel, and now as the auxbus is in and all the stars are aligned, I
> can finally submit this patchset of the devlink and mlx5 subfunction support.
>
> For more detailed information about subfunctions please see detailed tag
> log below.
Are there any further comments, objections or actions that need to be
taken on this series, anyone?
Looks like the discussion has ended. Not knowing any users who would
need this I'd like to at least make sure we have reasonable consensus
among vendors.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists