netdev - Re: [Patch bpf-next v7 12/13] sock_map: update sock type checks for UDP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 22:47:05 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
        Dongdong Wang <wangdongdong.6@...edance.com>,
        Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@...edance.com>,
        Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch bpf-next v7 12/13] sock_map: update sock type checks for UDP

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 4:10 PM John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com> wrote:
> I think its a bit odd for TCP_ESTABLISHED to work with !tcp, but
> thats not your invention so LGTM.

It has been there for many years, so why it is suddenly a problem with
my patchset? More importantly, why don't you change it by yourself
as it looks odd to you? Please go ahead to do whatever you want,
your patches are always welcome.

Thanks.