lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210413182051.GR1463@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:20:51 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Ben Whitten <ben.whitten@...il.com>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc:     linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: leds: netdev trigger - misleading link state indication at boot

Hi,

I'm seeing some odd behaviour with the netdev trigger and some WiFi
interfaces.

When the WiFi interface has never been brought up (so is in an
operationally disabled state), if I bind a LED to the netdev
trigger, setting the device_name to the WiFi interface name and
enable the "link" property, the LED illuminates, indicating that
the WiFi device has link - but it's disabled.

If I up/down the WiFi interface, thereby returning it to the
original state, the link LED goes out.

I suspect ledtrig-netdev.c needs to check that the device is both
up (dev->flags & IFF_UP) and netif_carrier_ok(dev) both return true,
rather than just relying on netif_carrier_ok(). I don't think using
netif_running() is appropriate, as that will return true before
ndo_open() has been called to initialise the carrier state.

Agreed?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ