[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93187571-48bf-53d4-05b8-d29075efb792@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:03:34 +0800
From: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@...wei.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: <helgaas@...nel.org>, <kw@...ux.com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<rajur@...lsio.com>, <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V3 1/6] PCI: Use cached Device Capabilities
Register
On 2021/6/14 13:42, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 05:29:10PM +0800, Dongdong Liu wrote:
>> It will make sense to store the pcie_devcap value in the pci_dev
>> structure instead of reading Device Capabilities Register multiple
>> times. The fisrt place to use pcie_devcap is in set_pcie_port_type(),
>> get the pcie_devcap value here, then use cached pcie_devcap in the
>> needed place.
>>
>> Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/pci/cobalt/cobalt-driver.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/pci/pci.c | 5 +----
>> drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 11 ++++-------
>> drivers/pci/probe.c | 11 +++--------
>> drivers/pci/quirks.c | 3 +--
>> include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
>> 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/cobalt/cobalt-driver.c b/drivers/media/pci/cobalt/cobalt-driver.c
>> index 839503e..04e735f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/pci/cobalt/cobalt-driver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/cobalt/cobalt-driver.c
>> @@ -193,11 +193,11 @@ void cobalt_pcie_status_show(struct cobalt *cobalt)
>> return;
>>
>> /* Device */
>> - pcie_capability_read_dword(pci_dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP, &capa);
>> pcie_capability_read_word(pci_dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, &ctrl);
>> pcie_capability_read_word(pci_dev, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA, &stat);
>> cobalt_info("PCIe device capability 0x%08x: Max payload %d\n",
>> - capa, get_payload_size(capa & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PAYLOAD));
>> + capa,
>> + get_payload_size(pci_dev->pcie_devcap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PAYLOAD));
>
> Overly long line.
Will fix
>
>> + if (!(child->pcie_devcap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_RBER) && !aspm_force) {
>
> Another one.
Will fix.
Thanks,
Dongdong
>
> Otherwise looks good:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists